Gonadorelin is listed at 10 mg for $112.00. It is the synthetic equivalent of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, a decapeptide, and it carries modifications at both termini — one of which is unusual enough that it is the first thing a buyer should look for on the certificate.
This covers the structure, what each end-modification does, why the molecule is short-lived once in solution, and what to check before ordering. Everything about biological activity is reported from published work and named by model. The material is supplied for laboratory research only.
| Gonadorelin | Catalog specification |
|---|---|
| Vial strengths | 10 mg |
| Sequence | pGlu-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg-Pro-Gly-NH2 |
| Molecular formula | C55H75N17O13 |
| Molecular weight | 1182.29 g/mol |
| Amino acid count | 10 |
| CAS number | 33515-09-2 |
From the Restate Health catalog record. Lot-specific values are on the certificate of analysis.
Ten residues, modified at both ends
Gonadorelin reproduces the natural GnRH decapeptide. The C-terminus is amidated, which is common enough in signalling peptides to be unremarkable. The N-terminus is not: it is a pyroglutamate residue.
Pyroglutamate is a cyclised glutamine or glutamate, in which the side chain has closed onto the backbone nitrogen to form a five-membered ring. The effect is to block the N-terminus — there is no free amine left — and it is a genuine structural feature of the natural molecule rather than a synthetic convenience.
Two consequences follow. The cyclisation removes a mass of water relative to the open residue, so the observed mass on a certificate reflects the cyclised form and will not match a calculation done from the linear sequence without accounting for it. And because the N-terminus is blocked, the degradation routes that start at a free amine are closed, while the routes that run through the backbone are not.
Reading peptide nomenclature covers how a modified terminus is written in a sequence line. Confirm the certificate shows the pyroglutamate explicitly; a sequence written as though the first residue were ordinary glutamine describes a different molecule.
Short-lived in solution
GnRH and its direct synthetic equivalent are characterised in published work by rapid clearance in biological systems, and that fragility has a chemical basis that persists outside them. The backbone carries cleavage-prone positions, and once the peptide is in aqueous solution those positions are available.
The practical consequence is that gonadorelin is a compound where the lyophilised and dissolved states differ more than usual. Dry material in a sealed vial under cold storage is reasonably durable. The same material in solution at room temperature has a usable life measured in short intervals rather than in days. Peptide shelf life covers the general difference and how peptides degrade covers the routes.
Three handling rules follow directly. Reconstitute close to the point of use rather than in advance. Aliquot into single-session volumes so that no portion is thawed more than once — freeze-thaw cycles and aliquoting covers the method. And keep solutions cold and worked quickly rather than left standing.
What the certificate should carry
Five things, and for this compound the first is not optional.
The sequence with the pyroglutamate and the C-terminal amide both shown. The observed mass, consistent with the cyclised N-terminus. Purity by a named chromatographic method with stated conditions — HPLC purity explained covers what the number represents. A related-substances breakdown, because for a backbone-labile peptide the impurities worth knowing about include hydrolysis products that formed after synthesis rather than during it. And net peptide content.
Peptide impurities explained covers the categories and reading a certificate of analysis line by line covers the full document. For a compound that degrades in solution, the age of the certificate relative to the material is worth noting as well — a release figure from a year ago describes the lot as it was then.
Planning around a short solution life
A compound that degrades quickly once dissolved changes how a vial should be used rather than merely how it should be stored, and planning for that before the material arrives is the difference between documented performance and quiet loss.
Decide the working concentration in advance, so reconstitution is a single calculated step rather than an adjustment made while the solution sits. Reconstitution arithmetic covers volume, concentration and molarity, and reconstitution solvents compared covers the diluent choice.
Aliquot immediately into single-session volumes rather than storing a bulk solution and drawing from it. Every return to a shared container costs time at temperature and adds a thaw cycle. For a backbone-labile peptide those costs compound faster than they do for a robust sequence.
And size the reconstitution to the session rather than to the vial. Reconstituting 10 mg because the vial holds 10 mg, when the session needs a fraction of it, puts the remainder on the short clock for no reason. Where the work allows, a vial that can be split dry before reconstitution preserves more of its value.
Documentation for a labile compound
For most compounds a certificate describes the material adequately for the life of the vial. For one that degrades measurably in solution, two additional questions apply.
How old is the certificate relative to the lot? A release figure describes the material at release. For a stable lyophilised powder that remains a fair description for a long time; the question is worth asking anyway, because the answer tells you how long the lot has been in inventory before reaching you.
And what storage has the lot seen since release? A supplier who can answer that has a cold chain they monitor; one who cannot is asking you to assume it. Cold chain for peptide shipments covers what the shipping package is doing, and storage equipment and monitoring covers the conditions at both ends.
Neither question is unreasonable and both are easily answered by a supplier who runs a controlled operation. The quality of the answers is at least as informative as the certificate itself. The supplier audit checklist covers the rest of the pre-order conversation.
How the listing compares
Gonadorelin and Kisspeptin-10 sit in the same catalogue section, both at 10 mg, at $112.00 and $81.20 respectively. Both are decapeptides and both are amidated. The price difference is not explained by length.
| Gonadorelin | Kisspeptin-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| N-terminus | Pyroglutamate, cyclised | Free |
| C-terminus | Amide | Amide |
| Catalogue price, 10 mg | $112.00 | $81.20 |
| Principal handling issue | Degradation in solution | Getting it into solution |
| First certificate check | Pyroglutamate shown | Fragment length confirmed |
Where the two decapeptides differ
The pyroglutamate is a reasonable part of the answer on price. Introducing and confirming a cyclised N-terminal residue adds a step to synthesis and a question to analysis, and both carry cost. What research peptides cost and why covers where the money in a vial actually goes.
What the price is buying
At $112.00 for 10 mg, gonadorelin sits above several longer peptides in the same catalogue, which is a useful reminder that length is not the only cost driver.
Two specific costs sit in this molecule. The pyroglutamate residue requires either a protected building block or a cyclisation step, and either route adds work and an analytical confirmation. And a compound that is labile in solution is harder to handle through purification and release testing, because every analytical step is also an opportunity for the material to change while it is being measured.
Neither of those is visible on a product page. They are the reason a ten-residue peptide can cost more than a twenty-residue one, and knowing they exist is what makes a price look reasonable rather than arbitrary.
Before ordering
Confirm the sequence and both terminal modifications in writing. Confirm the certificate is published and verifiable — how to verify a certificate of analysis covers checking it with the issuing laboratory. Confirm net peptide content so the $112.00 can be compared against anything else, using the method in price per milligram.
And plan the reconstitution before the vial arrives. For a compound with this stability profile, the difference between a planned single-session use and an improvised one is the difference between material that performs as documented and material that does not.

